02-06-2020 各方矛盾(52)- 政府及执法人员,A letter to police officers,当年分家产是否丰厚,当年家政帮手
爸爸妈妈:更新:向医生提要求:use "session, remote-type", do not use "virture". Use arrow to select. (逗号:coma,句号:period)
And, can medical providers' generic legal concern regarding if only making lawful money be addressed according to these licensed medical providers' standard procedures and protocols? Is it possible that medical and supporting staffs can imagine that they actual have some law professionals who work as their colleague(s) to protect them from this sort of concerns?
用这一段提要求:I address my patient-requests to self-pay remote-session medical program that I am lawfully enrolled in and has been supported by the US law representive FBI Agency and Federal Justice Department as lawful self-pay medical program.(再在这里加上你们的要求,比如哪里不舒服,等等),否则根本不知是谁在远程乱搞。不知现在是否有些华裔警员在协助推销什么治疗设备,居然使用警方的公权力不准我享受我自己的合法钱所购买的合法医疗服务,只准我用这些既不准我花我自己的钱又不提供有品质医疗照顾的未必有行医执照的野鸡服务。(其余在英文信的后面)
To FBI agents and Federal and local Justice Department employees:
There has been doubts if I am spending my own money on my remote-type medical care, and what has been clarified by Federal Justice Department as I known of?
My answer: What I heard is: $400Million and related other payments for each of these five years I published has been verified as lawful money source, lawful given, and lawful investor tax rate. The third year's providing-Trust I published has been verified as birthmark Trust-inheriting Trust. The third year means fiscal year started on October 1 of 2016.
The current confusion is if my current medical payment has been from this published five years, and if lawful if not one of the published five. This confusion has caused a lot of employes of FBI agency and of Federal Justice department from Cinese community to be harassive and interruptive on my remote-type medical treatment. My complain is that this harassive and interruptive is beyond the disciplines of this two government agencies, and it has been unbearable to me.
So, I say, Can this generic legal concern be managed according to FBI and Justice Department's work protocols and disciplines? Those Chinese agents use their employment statuses to unauthorizely but forcefully stop my regular medical treatment has been very harmful to my biological health, not to mention how more harmful it can be from their enthusiam to conduct voluntary investiongation violently.
I refuse to receive voluntary & donation based medical care when I have my self-paid medicare availabe as lawful medicare program. So, from now on, I will address my patient-requests to self-pay remote-medical program that I am lawfully enrolled and has been supported by the US law representive FBI Agency and Federal Justice Department.
Min Fang
02-06-2020
爸爸妈妈:不用担心钱,爷爷给我的礼物很丰厚的。现在上海还在吵说我送的礼物(八千多万美元)根本是嗟来之食。
听听我对于上海方面的气愤:育融是宁波方家的媳妇,育融的宁波方家儿女对于育融娘家来说,都是姻亲的外家孩子(即育融娘家的外孙子女)。何况育融所育的那些宁波方家姻亲的外家孩子(即宁波方家的外孙子女)。听听,上海方面都是育融娘家的外孙子女,所以,1)他们要求育融亲生爸爸光绪皇帝的爱新觉罗家族必须“交出”爱新觉罗姓氏(他们觉得这个姓氏很高级),这是宁波方家的第一级外公家。2)他们要求,育融亲生外公恭亲王奕新当年居住现在早已被出售的恭亲王府,必须交出一部分旅游门票收入,这是宁波方家的第二级外公家。3)他们直接出售育融曾外公的上海育家爷爷已经信托了的育家房子。做为多罗育家的继承子嗣育靓丽,我当时就已经报警处理,他们还态度强硬。这是宁波方家的第三级外公家,是他们这些人第四第五级的外公家。
这是育融这代往上,育融这代之后,是我和爸爸很惨,我的钱似乎是理直气壮就该抢,爸爸的钱更是似乎应该直接被他们拿走,爷爷三兄妹分家是在1930-1931年,爸爸四兄妹分家是在1965年,2004年以后他们是直接到我这里抢,我是一直报警处理,谁怕谁啊?参阅:01-14-2020 为何我家分家产是如此的让世人难以理解?
据说现在上海还是真正认为我送的礼物(八千多万美元)根本是嗟来之食,我认为我作为亲戚送的礼物是额外的一份财富,走在哪里都不寒碜,我这里没有什么他们应该拿的钱的,我拿到的都是依据遗嘱继承的信托,从来不是他们的应得财产。
作为历史名人后裔的宁波方家的财产是怎么累积的,参阅:02-03-2020 中国历史名人的私有财产是怎么累计(一稿)? 爷爷弟妹拿到的百万大洋信托,爸爸弟妹也都是百万大洋(七十余万元仅一人)。依据0.5%的年利息计算,他们每年的利息收入是五千元至七千五百元,依据解放后的1%计算,每年利息收入是一万元至一万五千元,而当时的工资收入水平是:1949年以前的中华民国总统蒋介石只有年薪一万余元,1949年以后的中户人民共和国国家主席毛泽东只有年薪一千余元。他们当年分到的怎么不丰厚啦?他们这些人当年直接将百万元的存款本金花掉以致不再有可观的利息收入,那是他们自己的花钱选择,并不是我曾祖父给的或者我爷爷给的不够丰厚。
我们家近代:第一代,宁波镇海海河边的方麟玉,第二代:方治兴(一夫一妻父母婚姻的独子),第三代:方历柒(一夫一妻父母婚姻的独子,父亲方治兴可能曾休妻而无子女(即有子女财产安排但必须永随母姓)),第四代:方智仁(一夫一妻父母婚姻的三名子女中的长子),第五代:方文海(一夫一妻父母婚姻的四名子女中的长子)
我对他们的所谓愤怒已经不予理睬了,莫明奇妙有点离谱,我又没拿他们的应得财产钱。他们当年都有分到丰厚家产的,方智仁的家都已经分家了五十多年了,曾祖母曾祖父的家更是分家了快一百年了。我现在作为亲戚送的礼物是分家产以外的一份八千多万美元的财富,走在哪里都不寒碜,我这里没有什么他们应该拿的钱的,我拿到的都是依据遗嘱继承的信托。至于有些担心网上送礼计划的符合条件者会很多的,我是估计第一年第二年甚至第三年可能是满拥挤的,但稍后应该就不会那么拥挤了,有一个“富豪”朋友的一般期待值应该是可以满足的。
上海方面主要是因为他们有朋友是警察,他们认为报警也就是找他们的朋友而已,不怕的。
我的认为?也就是撇清:并不想当坏人的那些警察朋友为什么会愿意帮他们?换句话说,也就是这些警察为何不肯执法或者没有了警察应有的法律概念?还是在执法时发现有什么法律界限没撇清而造成了执法有难度?
上海之前最大的矛盾:当年的警方朋友为何协助私人助理向我爷爷方智仁索取奶奶毛阿妹的子宫费。据我所知的:他们的上海警察朋友一直以来纠结的是:奶奶毛阿妹是自己愿意的,既然是富豪老婆自己愿意的,且对方老婆又很在意而闹的婚姻很不愉快,为何不肯支付费用?
我当时对此所表达的愤怒是:男女双方自愿与否,是否只是区别了刑事强奸与否,还是已经要求了对方提供收费的性服务?对方愿意收费,可奶奶毛阿妹从未要求对方提供性服务,我爷爷更是没有要求对方提供如此服务,我奶奶的绝大多数零花钱已经被对方收取,为何必须由我爷爷甚至我父亲和我继续支付费用?
自从这一点矛盾撇清,上海那边要求爸爸方文海和我方敏继续支付奶奶屁股钱的那份“政府协助的压力”就明显没有了。
----2020年2月6日。
And, can medical providers' generic legal concern regarding if only making lawful money be addressed according to these licensed medical providers' standard procedures and protocols? Is it possible that medical and supporting staffs can imagine that they actual have some law professionals who work as their colleague(s) to protect them from this sort of concerns?
02-06-2020
用这一段提要求:I address my patient-requests to self-pay remote-session medical program that I am lawfully enrolled in and has been supported by the US law representive FBI Agency and Federal Justice Department as lawful self-pay medical program.(再在这里加上你们的要求,比如哪里不舒服,等等),否则根本不知是谁在远程乱搞。不知现在是否有些华裔警员在协助推销什么治疗设备,居然使用警方的公权力不准我享受我自己的合法钱所购买的合法医疗服务,只准我用这些既不准我花我自己的钱又不提供有品质医疗照顾的未必有行医执照的野鸡服务。(其余在英文信的后面)
To FBI agents and Federal and local Justice Department employees:
There has been doubts if I am spending my own money on my remote-type medical care, and what has been clarified by Federal Justice Department as I known of?
My answer: What I heard is: $400Million and related other payments for each of these five years I published has been verified as lawful money source, lawful given, and lawful investor tax rate. The third year's providing-Trust I published has been verified as birthmark Trust-inheriting Trust. The third year means fiscal year started on October 1 of 2016.
The current confusion is if my current medical payment has been from this published five years, and if lawful if not one of the published five. This confusion has caused a lot of employes of FBI agency and of Federal Justice department from Cinese community to be harassive and interruptive on my remote-type medical treatment. My complain is that this harassive and interruptive is beyond the disciplines of this two government agencies, and it has been unbearable to me.
So, I say, Can this generic legal concern be managed according to FBI and Justice Department's work protocols and disciplines? Those Chinese agents use their employment statuses to unauthorizely but forcefully stop my regular medical treatment has been very harmful to my biological health, not to mention how more harmful it can be from their enthusiam to conduct voluntary investiongation violently.
I refuse to receive voluntary & donation based medical care when I have my self-paid medicare availabe as lawful medicare program. So, from now on, I will address my patient-requests to self-pay remote-medical program that I am lawfully enrolled and has been supported by the US law representive FBI Agency and Federal Justice Department.
Min Fang
02-06-2020
爸爸妈妈:不用担心钱,爷爷给我的礼物很丰厚的。现在上海还在吵说我送的礼物(八千多万美元)根本是嗟来之食。
听听我对于上海方面的气愤:育融是宁波方家的媳妇,育融的宁波方家儿女对于育融娘家来说,都是姻亲的外家孩子(即育融娘家的外孙子女)。何况育融所育的那些宁波方家姻亲的外家孩子(即宁波方家的外孙子女)。听听,上海方面都是育融娘家的外孙子女,所以,1)他们要求育融亲生爸爸光绪皇帝的爱新觉罗家族必须“交出”爱新觉罗姓氏(他们觉得这个姓氏很高级),这是宁波方家的第一级外公家。2)他们要求,育融亲生外公恭亲王奕新当年居住现在早已被出售的恭亲王府,必须交出一部分旅游门票收入,这是宁波方家的第二级外公家。3)他们直接出售育融曾外公的上海育家爷爷已经信托了的育家房子。做为多罗育家的继承子嗣育靓丽,我当时就已经报警处理,他们还态度强硬。这是宁波方家的第三级外公家,是他们这些人第四第五级的外公家。
这是育融这代往上,育融这代之后,是我和爸爸很惨,我的钱似乎是理直气壮就该抢,爸爸的钱更是似乎应该直接被他们拿走,爷爷三兄妹分家是在1930-1931年,爸爸四兄妹分家是在1965年,2004年以后他们是直接到我这里抢,我是一直报警处理,谁怕谁啊?参阅:01-14-2020 为何我家分家产是如此的让世人难以理解?
据说现在上海还是真正认为我送的礼物(八千多万美元)根本是嗟来之食,我认为我作为亲戚送的礼物是额外的一份财富,走在哪里都不寒碜,我这里没有什么他们应该拿的钱的,我拿到的都是依据遗嘱继承的信托,从来不是他们的应得财产。
作为历史名人后裔的宁波方家的财产是怎么累积的,参阅:02-03-2020 中国历史名人的私有财产是怎么累计(一稿)? 爷爷弟妹拿到的百万大洋信托,爸爸弟妹也都是百万大洋(七十余万元仅一人)。依据0.5%的年利息计算,他们每年的利息收入是五千元至七千五百元,依据解放后的1%计算,每年利息收入是一万元至一万五千元,而当时的工资收入水平是:1949年以前的中华民国总统蒋介石只有年薪一万余元,1949年以后的中户人民共和国国家主席毛泽东只有年薪一千余元。他们当年分到的怎么不丰厚啦?他们这些人当年直接将百万元的存款本金花掉以致不再有可观的利息收入,那是他们自己的花钱选择,并不是我曾祖父给的或者我爷爷给的不够丰厚。
我们家近代:第一代,宁波镇海海河边的方麟玉,第二代:方治兴(一夫一妻父母婚姻的独子),第三代:方历柒(一夫一妻父母婚姻的独子,父亲方治兴可能曾休妻而无子女(即有子女财产安排但必须永随母姓)),第四代:方智仁(一夫一妻父母婚姻的三名子女中的长子),第五代:方文海(一夫一妻父母婚姻的四名子女中的长子)
我对他们的所谓愤怒已经不予理睬了,莫明奇妙有点离谱,我又没拿他们的应得财产钱。他们当年都有分到丰厚家产的,方智仁的家都已经分家了五十多年了,曾祖母曾祖父的家更是分家了快一百年了。我现在作为亲戚送的礼物是分家产以外的一份八千多万美元的财富,走在哪里都不寒碜,我这里没有什么他们应该拿的钱的,我拿到的都是依据遗嘱继承的信托。至于有些担心网上送礼计划的符合条件者会很多的,我是估计第一年第二年甚至第三年可能是满拥挤的,但稍后应该就不会那么拥挤了,有一个“富豪”朋友的一般期待值应该是可以满足的。
上海方面主要是因为他们有朋友是警察,他们认为报警也就是找他们的朋友而已,不怕的。
我的认为?也就是撇清:并不想当坏人的那些警察朋友为什么会愿意帮他们?换句话说,也就是这些警察为何不肯执法或者没有了警察应有的法律概念?还是在执法时发现有什么法律界限没撇清而造成了执法有难度?
上海之前最大的矛盾:当年的警方朋友为何协助私人助理向我爷爷方智仁索取奶奶毛阿妹的子宫费。据我所知的:他们的上海警察朋友一直以来纠结的是:奶奶毛阿妹是自己愿意的,既然是富豪老婆自己愿意的,且对方老婆又很在意而闹的婚姻很不愉快,为何不肯支付费用?
我当时对此所表达的愤怒是:男女双方自愿与否,是否只是区别了刑事强奸与否,还是已经要求了对方提供收费的性服务?对方愿意收费,可奶奶毛阿妹从未要求对方提供性服务,我爷爷更是没有要求对方提供如此服务,我奶奶的绝大多数零花钱已经被对方收取,为何必须由我爷爷甚至我父亲和我继续支付费用?
自从这一点矛盾撇清,上海那边要求爸爸方文海和我方敏继续支付奶奶屁股钱的那份“政府协助的压力”就明显没有了。
----2020年2月6日。
Comments
Post a Comment