06-18-2019 为什么是上海第一医学院的校友最气愤“谁才是福特老婆？”
爸爸妈妈：
昨天我是一夜都没睡，左腿的治疗经历着腿部的肌肉肌腱等的调整，昨天晚上临睡前，胯骨初调好了，漆关节和脚踝还没有调，所以，整个左下肢是扭着的，关节都不正，真正是坐立难安，躺着也是感觉到牵拉痛，一夜辗转难眠难以休息，今天早上估计开始第二次调整了，才睡着。现在是不能长坐，胯骨还不能吃重。如果你们也有类似体验，别担心，会好的。我的猫阿妹目前还是一脸的痛苦。这次只是左腿，右腿估计还有一次，还有上肢和体内器官的位置调整之类的，有什么不适，说出来但不要怕，怕也没用，自己照顾好自己。
----2019年6月18日。
2007年，美国的纽约有场Stadium Wedding，据说这场婚礼是北京药学专业的一个穿着婚纱躲在角落里等着替换绕圈游行新娘的一场婚礼，而当天的纽约还有一场罗德里格斯和福特联姻婚礼，据说这个罗德里格斯就是2007年6月一场继承会议，7月一场结婚会议的同一个人，而这个婚礼里的福特新郎在上海医科大学（现复旦大学上海医学院）的一场谈话，让上海医科大学毕业的那些男男女女为了表达最最知道谁才是真正的福特女人，甘愿拿刀捅死我的立场，那刀可是可以做激光近视矫正手术的那种，所表达的立场是如果没用激光刀把我捅死捅烂就难以表达一腔愤怒的坚决气势。
我方敏本人立场：经历这场浩劫，被告知是上海医科大学毕业的，不会让我有任何亲切的感觉，也别指望我会有任何亲切的回应。我只是上海医科大学毕业的，但我不是上海医科大学的校友。
----2019年6月18日。
https://chroniclenote.blogspot.com/2019/04/04-01-2019.html
https://chroniclenote.blogspot.com/p/03-16-2019-prenup-was-never-desired-but.html
My-side personal status prelude for that famous marriage discussion on July 1st of 2004:
I was 37 years old in 2004 who newly inherited some handsome Trusts-wealth that a family with an heir, some children, and a marriage partner(s) naturally became such a concentration in my life, but I was in a biologically exhausted health situation that sexually involved romance was not appealing at all. So, I participated in that discussion for the reason to have children in a (polygamist or not) marriage with one (or more) marriage partner(s) who did not have any biological offspring yet in 2004. To me being a polygamist, a man who already a biological child means a leftover male who is old and undesirable in considering seriously involved romance.
The reason for the comprised prenup became fundamental for that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion
Not willing to let any part of the own-wealth to be in risk of the possible taken-over was from all participants of that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion.
What I think what might have happened after that marriage discussion?
I don't have a clue about what might have happened after July 1st of 2004, but I am positive, which means not assertive, that I may have biological and legitimate children from definitely a factually virgin-father man that, in 2004, I was willing to be involved in marriage. The not-assertive is about if I do have a biological child or children but I don't think that is any public interest but my own private matter.
Do I positively look forward to reuniting with my biological children and the marriage partner?
That depends on if that is a marriage partner who only shares biological children with me and still in the marriage with his heart. To me, marriage means a willingness-based responsibility, relationship, and exclusive inside-marriage sex (when I am healthy enough).
How long it takes for me to be healthy from my current health situation?
I have already asked law enforcement's help to free me from possible sexual harassments of any party that intended to maim my biological nature appearance, to compromise my health, to take over my wealth, to replace me from my possible marriage, or to destroy my way of living my life.
----March 16th, 2019
My understanding of all those financial confusions:
If confusions are about if someone's lawfully-owned money, this someone should have no need to commit any crime in order to get this lawful money when laws-help are already available all around,
If the intention is to get not-lawfully-owned money, this someone is also not privileged at all to commit any crime without being prosecuted as well.
----March 17th, 2019
昨天我是一夜都没睡，左腿的治疗经历着腿部的肌肉肌腱等的调整，昨天晚上临睡前，胯骨初调好了，漆关节和脚踝还没有调，所以，整个左下肢是扭着的，关节都不正，真正是坐立难安，躺着也是感觉到牵拉痛，一夜辗转难眠难以休息，今天早上估计开始第二次调整了，才睡着。现在是不能长坐，胯骨还不能吃重。如果你们也有类似体验，别担心，会好的。我的猫阿妹目前还是一脸的痛苦。这次只是左腿，右腿估计还有一次，还有上肢和体内器官的位置调整之类的，有什么不适，说出来但不要怕，怕也没用，自己照顾好自己。
----2019年6月18日。
2007年，美国的纽约有场Stadium Wedding，据说这场婚礼是北京药学专业的一个穿着婚纱躲在角落里等着替换绕圈游行新娘的一场婚礼，而当天的纽约还有一场罗德里格斯和福特联姻婚礼，据说这个罗德里格斯就是2007年6月一场继承会议，7月一场结婚会议的同一个人，而这个婚礼里的福特新郎在上海医科大学（现复旦大学上海医学院）的一场谈话，让上海医科大学毕业的那些男男女女为了表达最最知道谁才是真正的福特女人，甘愿拿刀捅死我的立场，那刀可是可以做激光近视矫正手术的那种，所表达的立场是如果没用激光刀把我捅死捅烂就难以表达一腔愤怒的坚决气势。
我方敏本人立场：经历这场浩劫，被告知是上海医科大学毕业的，不会让我有任何亲切的感觉，也别指望我会有任何亲切的回应。我只是上海医科大学毕业的，但我不是上海医科大学的校友。
----2019年6月18日。
https://chroniclenote.blogspot.com/2019/04/04-01-2019.html
https://chroniclenote.blogspot.com/p/03-16-2019-prenup-was-never-desired-but.html
My-side personal status prelude for that famous marriage discussion on July 1st of 2004:
I was 37 years old in 2004 who newly inherited some handsome Trusts-wealth that a family with an heir, some children, and a marriage partner(s) naturally became such a concentration in my life, but I was in a biologically exhausted health situation that sexually involved romance was not appealing at all. So, I participated in that discussion for the reason to have children in a (polygamist or not) marriage with one (or more) marriage partner(s) who did not have any biological offspring yet in 2004. To me being a polygamist, a man who already a biological child means a leftover male who is old and undesirable in considering seriously involved romance.
The reason for the comprised prenup became fundamental for that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion
Not willing to let any part of the own-wealth to be in risk of the possible taken-over was from all participants of that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion.
What I think what might have happened after that marriage discussion?
I don't have a clue about what might have happened after July 1st of 2004, but I am positive, which means not assertive, that I may have biological and legitimate children from definitely a factually virgin-father man that, in 2004, I was willing to be involved in marriage. The not-assertive is about if I do have a biological child or children but I don't think that is any public interest but my own private matter.
Do I positively look forward to reuniting with my biological children and the marriage partner?
That depends on if that is a marriage partner who only shares biological children with me and still in the marriage with his heart. To me, marriage means a willingness-based responsibility, relationship, and exclusive inside-marriage sex (when I am healthy enough).
How long it takes for me to be healthy from my current health situation?
I have already asked law enforcement's help to free me from possible sexual harassments of any party that intended to maim my biological nature appearance, to compromise my health, to take over my wealth, to replace me from my possible marriage, or to destroy my way of living my life.
----March 16th, 2019
My understanding of all those financial confusions:
If confusions are about if someone's lawfully-owned money, this someone should have no need to commit any crime in order to get this lawful money when laws-help are already available all around,
If the intention is to get not-lawfully-owned money, this someone is also not privileged at all to commit any crime without being prosecuted as well.
----March 17th, 2019
Comments
Post a Comment